Gratis verktyg
Alla verktyg →
Engagement rate-kalkylator
Hype-kalkylator
Influencer-priskalkylator
EU-reklammärkningsgenerator
Influencer-kontraktsgenerator
EU moms-kalkylator
Loi Influenceurs-granskning
AGCOM Codice di Condotta-granskning
Influencer-fakturagenerator
EMV-kalkylator
Räckviddskalkylator
Kampanjbudget-kalkylator
Influencer-ROI-kalkylator
© 2026 Collabios – det enklaste sättet för brands att anlita verifierade influencers.
Free influencer campaign budget calculator that turns a goal, a platform and a creator mix into a defensible number. Brand teams use it to set an influencer marketing budget before writing the brief; creators use it to see what a brand with this roster actually budgets, so they can price their own deliverables against it. Pick your goal, choose how many nano, micro and macro creators you plan to book, set deliverables per creator, and the calculator returns a recommended budget, a realistic post-negotiation range, and a per-tier breakdown you can paste straight into a plan. Every euro traces back to the Collabios rate model, so the math is reproducible on both sides of the table.
Campaign goal
Primary platform
Content type per creator
Niche
Creator mix (how many of each tier)
Nano · 1K-10K followers
Micro · 10K-100K followers
Macro · 100K-1M followers
A mix of micro creators plus one or two macro anchors usually beats an all-macro roster on cost per engaged follower — that is exactly the micro-vs-macro trade-off the budget makes visible.
Deliverables per creator
Posts, videos or UGC assets each creator produces for the campaign.
Contingency + management buffer %: 12%
Covers brief revisions, usage-rights extensions, shipping of seeded product, and campaign-management time. 10-20% is typical; conversion campaigns run higher because of tracking and iteration.
Recommended campaign budget
€7,616
Realistic booked range (post-negotiation, incl. buffer): €4,570 – €6,480
Creator content spend: €6,800 · Contingency + management buffer: €816
9 creators · 18 deliverables total
See creators in this budget →Per-tier breakdown
Combined creator audience: 445,000
Assumes tier midpoints (nano ≈ 5K, micro ≈ 40K, macro ≈ 300K). A planning sketch of aggregate follower reach, not guaranteed impressions.
Creator? This is what a brand with this roster budgets — price your own deliverables against the per-tier rate above.
Five steps used by brand teams setting a budget and by creators pricing themselves against one.
Awareness, engagement or conversions. The goal sets a sensible default contingency (higher for conversion campaigns, which need tracking and iteration) and points you toward the right creator mix.
Instagram, TikTok, YouTube or UGC (with no posting). Each platform + content type has its own 2026 reference rate — a YouTube long-form video costs far more per creator than an Instagram Story slide.
Enter how many nano, micro and macro creators you plan to book. A mix of micro creators plus one or two macro anchors usually beats an all-macro roster on cost per engaged follower — the tool makes that trade-off visible in euros.
How many posts, videos or UGC assets each creator produces, plus a 10-20% buffer for revisions, usage rights, seeded product and management time.
You get a recommended budget, a realistic post-negotiation range, the split between content spend and contingency, and a per-tier table you can paste into a campaign plan.
Most influencer budgets are set top-down (a share of the marketing budget) and then reverse-engineered into a roster. That order is backwards: it produces a number the campaign has to be squeezed into, rather than a number the campaign actually needs. The calculator above works bottom-up (from creators and deliverables to a total) because that is the only order that tells you whether the plan and the money agree. Below: the working logic, the small-budget case, and how creators should read the same number.
A top-down budget answers the wrong question. "What can we afford?" gives you a ceiling; "what does this campaign cost?" gives you a plan. Building from the roster up forces three decisions that a round number hides: how many creators, at which tiers, producing how many deliverables. Price each of those at a real 2026 rate and the total either fits the ceiling or it does not — and if it does not, you can see exactly which lever to pull (fewer macro creators, fewer deliverables, a longer flight) instead of arbitrarily trimming. The contingency line matters just as much: revisions, usage-rights extensions and seeded-product shipping are not edge cases, they are every campaign, and a budget without a 10-20% buffer is a budget that will be overspent.
The single most valuable thing a budget calculator shows is the cost of the macro tier relative to the micro tier. Because engagement rates run higher at smaller sizes and rates scale sub-linearly with followers, a roster of several micro creators frequently buys more engaged reach per euro than one macro anchor at the same total spend. That does not make macro creators wrong — a macro anchor buys reach and credibility a micro roster cannot, and some campaigns need exactly that. But the decision should be made with the euro difference on screen, not by defaulting to the biggest name the budget can afford. Put both rosters into the calculator and compare the recommended budgets side by side before you commit.
A small budget is not a reason to skip influencer marketing; it is a reason to build the roster differently. At the low end, the calculator will steer you toward nano and micro creators, UGC-only deals (where you pay for content rights rather than posting reach), and fewer deliverables per creator with a tighter brief. A €1,500-3,000 flight of five nano creators producing one strong asset each is a real campaign, and often a better first test than a single mid-tier booking, because it spreads the bet across five audiences and five content styles. The tool exists partly to prove that a small number is still a workable number — it will size a five-figure roster and a four-figure one with the same math, so you can find the smallest budget that still runs a coherent campaign.
Once the calculator has given you a defensible budget, the next step is turning it into an actual roster without leaking the buffer. The workflow on Collabios: size the budget here, then browse verified creators filtered to the tiers and rate bands the breakdown assumes, book per collaboration rather than on a retainer so the spend maps one-to-one to the plan, and hold the contingency line as a real reserve rather than quietly spending it on a sixth creator. Because Collabios charges per collaboration and vets creators manually, the rate you plan against and the rate you book stay close, which is the whole point of budgeting bottom-up. When the flight ends, run the results through the Collabios influencer marketing ROI calculator to see whether the number paid back, and feed that answer into the next budget. Budget, book, measure, repeat — the calculator is step one of a loop, not a one-off estimate.
Slippa kall prospektering. Collabios verifierar varje creator innan hen dyker upp i sökningen — land, nisch, målgruppskvalitet och brand safety.
Bläddra bland verifierade europeiska creators →There is no universal number — it depends on your creator mix, platform and deliverables, which is exactly why this calculator builds the figure bottom-up instead of quoting a flat range. As a reference, a 2026 EU Instagram Reel prices at roughly €50 per deliverable for a nano creator, €300 for a micro creator and €2,250 for a macro creator (from the Collabios rate model, at each tier midpoint). A mixed roster of five nano, three micro and one macro creator at two deliverables each is about €6,800 of content spend before a 10-20% contingency buffer (≈ €7,600 with 12%). Enter your own roster above to get a number tied to your actual plan rather than an industry average.
Percentage-of-revenue rules ("spend X% on influencer") give you a ceiling, not a plan, and they are the reason so many budgets end up either overspent or spread too thin. This calculator deliberately ignores that top-down approach and prices the campaign from the roster up. If you do have a fixed percentage ceiling, use it as a constraint: build the roster you want, read the recommended budget, and if it exceeds the ceiling, adjust the levers (fewer macro creators, fewer deliverables, UGC-only deals) until the plan fits — rather than starting from the percentage and hoping a coherent campaign fits inside it.
The budget is a transparent aggregate, not a black box: budget = the sum, over each creator tier, of (number of creators × deliverables per creator × the rate per deliverable for that tier), multiplied by 1 plus your contingency percentage. The per-tier rates come from the same model that powers the Collabios Influencer Rate Calculator — 2026 European reference ranges synthesised from publicly disclosed rate cards (Influencer Marketing Hub, Klear, Modash, InfluenceFlow) — using labelled tier midpoints (nano ≈ 5K, micro ≈ 40K, macro ≈ 300K followers). Because every step is arithmetic on your inputs, you can reproduce the number by hand.
Yes — a small budget changes the roster shape, not the viability. The calculator will point a small budget toward nano and micro creators, UGC-only deals where you pay for content rights instead of posting reach, and fewer deliverables per creator. A four-figure flight of several nano creators producing one strong asset each is a real campaign and often a better first test than a single mid-tier booking, because it spreads the bet across more audiences and content styles. Set your creator counts low and watch the recommended budget drop — the same math sizes a €2,000 campaign and a €50,000 one.
Run it in reverse. When a brand says their budget is tight, enter the roster they describe and see what "tight" means at your tier — a number that is small for a macro creator is often completely fair for a micro one. The per-tier rate the calculator shows is a benchmark-backed anchor for your own quote: it tells you what the brand has likely allocated per deliverable at your size, so you can price against the plan instead of guessing. Knowing that before you reply is the difference between discounting yourself and holding your rate.
Because the extras are not edge cases — they happen on almost every campaign. An extra round of edits, a usage-rights extension so you can run the content as a paid ad, product that has to be shipped to seeded creators, and the management time to coordinate a multi-creator roster all cost money that a bare content budget ignores. A 10-20% buffer (the calculator defaults higher for conversion campaigns, which need tracking and iteration) turns those from budget-breaking surprises into planned reserve. A budget without a contingency line is a budget that will be overspent.
Primärkällor
Varje påstående i det här verktyget är förankrat i den underliggande regleringen eller branschkällan. Öppna valfri länk för att läsa originalet.
Skapat av Collabios · Den europeiska influencer-marknadsplatsen
Bläddra bland verifierade europeiska creators →